Editor:
While Jennifer O'Conner's intentions are a noble cause, the litany described in the response to the (story) "Pony ride operator lacking permits" (May 6, pg. 1) reads more like an indictment against people in general: "can, may" are used repeatedly inferring since this particular operator was not in conformance, you make a sweeping generalization that none of the animals anywhere ridden as ponies are being treated humanely.
Hoof aliments, saddle sores, mouth and teeth problems from ill fitting/carelessly rigged tackle, working in scorching heat and water being withheld ... all of that can happen anywhere on farms across the world, not just a local pony ride. You may also ask the operator who could be in a job with little or no options under a scorching sun (like immigrants picking the lettuce you eat), what's their feedback on their "ethical treatment."
Yes, it may be 2014 ... but we know someone right now is hoarding 150 cats in their house because they have issues ... but I don't believe every cat-owner mistreats their cats.
Ervin Raab
Walnut, Calif.
