A non-profit, environmental protection organization is claiming the Santa Monica Malibu School District is putting Malibu children and educators in harm’s way delaying required removal of toxic chemicals.

District officials want to combine PCB removal with other construction work on several school sites. They have said they will ask a court for an extension to the required timeline to remove PCBs and that the request will save millions in total costs. In their request, the District said the extension would allow them to remove the contaminated buildings entirely rather than just clean them.

PEER (Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility) released a press release Dec. 5 claiming SMMUSD’s proposed 5-year Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) clean up extension would put students and staff in classrooms that would expose them to illegal levels of hazardous chemicals.

SMMUSD says plans are in place to prevent this and these plans were met with public approval at a recent school board meeting.

“I don’t think they believe that this is dangerous, despite what federal law says,” Jennifer DeNicola, President of America Unites for Kids said. “They don’t think they’re putting anyone in danger … We have over 50 declarations of people in Malibu that oppose this motion. [SMMUSD] have 13 months to figure this out.”

In September 2016, PEER and another group, President of America Unites for Kids, won a federal court order requiring SMMUSD to remove all PCBs from older buildings in Malibu High School and Juan Cabrillo Elementary School by December 2019 or cease using the toxic buildings.

In May 2018, the SMMUSD school board agreed to suspend PCB abatement at MHS due to the Malibu School Realignment that includes combining some schools, moving others to vacant locations and new construction on some campuses.

Due to the passage of Measure M, the district has the money to pursue its plans and SMMUSD has filed a motion asking the court for an extension on the PCB removal completion date.

Without the extension, the district says only PCB remediation could occur. SMMUSD argues the extension would save roughly $10 million in costs as they should not have to remediate buildings with PCB that may be torn down in the Malibu school realignment.

“We are committed to moving students and staff out of impacted facilities as soon as we can,” SMMUSD superintendent Dr. Ben Drati said in a letter to parents and staff.

Plans thus far include moving students to a new middle school building on the MHS campus, scheduled to open Spring of 2019; moving Cabrillo students and staff to Point Dume for the 2019-20 school year; moving staff to a new administrative building, currently under construction; and remediating specific facilities to reduce exposure.

Drati says in the letter that specific details regarding students and staff will be moved will be developed as part of the MHS master campus plan.

“The interest of the community is to remove PCBs throughout the site instead of just remediating, and this plan would achieve that goal,” he said. “There is some expediency to this request due to the time needed to meet the court order if our request is denied. As we previously planned, this request was made soon after Measure M was approved.”

PEER says the lack of specifics is worrisome.

“They’re asking for five years and making no commitment at all,” Paula Dinerstein, general counsel for PEER said. “Although they say they’re doing all they can, there’s no concrete plan in Malibu. It’s all tentative. They’re asking for five years to do whatever they want to do.”

Dinerstein says SMMUSD’s motion is to be filed December 10 with a potential hearing on December 17.

angel@smdp.com

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

  1. First: This entire process was started by SMMUSD when they filed filed thier motion on Nov 19th (while most of Malibu was still under mandatory evacuation and the week of Thanksgiving). The plaintiffs, AU and PEER responded in opposition to the distircts motion on Dec 3rd. Now the District can respond to the opposition on Dec 10th, with potential hearings on Dec 17th.

    First: Malibu residents are not opposing consolidation of PCB removal with new construction. The opposition is to the District’s motion filed, that they were secretly preparing for during the Measure M campaign but failed to notify any voters that they were going to do this, seeking a 5-year extension on the current 2016 judgement. This would move their date to comply from Dec 31, 2019 to Dec 31, 2024, keeping kids, staff and teachers in toxic PCB contaminated classrooms for another 5 years. This would make the total time since the District knew about PCBs at the Malibu campus in 2009, 15 years of known exposure to an illegal toxic chemical that causes cancer, are linked to lower IQ, interference with brain and body development, as well as neurological, endocrine and thyroid disruption.

    Since the 2016 Judgment, the District has found PCBs in far more building materials that just doors and windows that are under the Judge’s ruling. PCBs have been found in the flooring of entire buildings, in the varnish on the walls, and in the air vents (at levels 2000x on average of the legal limit),

    The Judge’s orders due Dec 31, 2019 require remediation to to stop using the buildings with PCBs. So the logical answer is to stop using the buildings and put classes in portables until the construction is completed, They have 13 months to comply and get portables for the students and teachers that occupy PCB contamined classrooms. There is money available and space — not the district needs the will.

    In declarations filed in opposition to the District’s motion, more than 50% of the teachers of the affected schools, made their feelings clear that they do not support a 5 year extension and want to be removed from the PCB classrooms ASAP but no later than Dec 31, 2019. Most parents also are opposed to this extension. But being opposed to the extension does not mean that Malibu opposes plans to consolidate PCB removal with new construction. They just need to put everyone in portables to comply with the Judge’s orders and that gives the District the ability to do all the construction work at once and finish it so Malibu students and teachers can have their campus back. The District needs to remember that they are in the business of EDUCATION, not construction.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *