Two significant local measures are included on the 2016 Santa Monica

election ballot – SM and V. This article summarizes the measures, who

supports and opposes each; how much money is being raised and spent

to sway public opinion and garner votes.

Measure SM – City Council proposed amendments to City Charter

Article XXII (Oaks Initiative) to extend and clarify its provisions.

This measure would amend Article XXII of the City Charter, which was

adopted by the voters in 2000, commonly known as the Oaks Initiative.

The original Oaks Initiative was put on the ballot in 2000 to prohibit city

officials from awarding public benefits, such as development

agreements and contracts, to individuals or entities and then receiving a

personal benefit such as campaign contributions or employment from

the public benefit recipient. Oaks was aimed at lessening even the

appearance that public officials are expecting future personal benefits

when carrying out the people’s business. It passed by almost 60%.

The City has never investigated or enforced complaints of Oaks

violations. This will change in November if voters pass Measure SM.

Measure SM expands Oaks, and enables its enforcement by:

  • Placing enforcement responsibility in the hands of the independent

Criminal Division of the City Attorney’s office or a special prosecutor

who has no conflict of interest;

  • Permitting criminal and civil prosecutions of any violator, including

developers or contractors, who violate the law;

  • Clarifying which public officials are covered by Oaks (City Council, City

Manager, Planning Commissioners, Department Heads, and their


  • Clarifying that receiving a campaign contribution or personal

advantage in any location, including outside of Santa Monica, is


  • Requiring companies receiving public benefits to disclose the identity

of all owners so they cannot hide behind shell companies; and,

  • Specifying that remedies are cumulative against any violator.

Measure SM also creates an exception for unpaid volunteer members of

non-profit entities other than PACs or entities controlling PACs.

For example, many community members serve on the board of directors

for nonprofits that receive City funding.

No arguments against Measure SM were submitted and to date no

committee has been formed nor any money raised either for or against

these amendments.

Measure V – The Santa Monica College Classroom Repair, Career

Training, Higher Education Access, aims to improve local access to

affordable higher education for high school graduates/adults/veterans

by issuing $345,000,000 in bonds with a provision for citizen

oversight and annual audits. Bond proceeds are to be used to repair,

upgrade, construct, and modernize classrooms at SMC and John Adams

Middle School, and provide money for expanding Memorial Park. The

Tax Rate Statement estimates an additional annual increase of $250 per

$1 million of assessed value on Santa Monica properties. The Rent

Control Board may permit landlords to pass through all, some, or none

of the fees for the bond through to tenants, though it has not yet voted

on what those pass throughs may look like for Measure V. Past Rent

Control Boards allowed landlords to pass on 100% of SMC bond

property tax assessments. Tenants assessments are based on the

number of units per building.

Proponents of Measure V contend that SMC needs to replace

temporary classrooms installed after the 1994 earthquake, modernize

classrooms built in the 1950’s and 80’s, add a new science and math

extension, complete improvements at the SMC Performing Arts

Center/Broad Stage campus, upgrade technology and add landscape

improvements that will conserve water. In addition, up to $45 million

of bonds funds could go toward joint projects with Santa Monica and

Malibu – expansion of playing fields at Memorial Park and infrastructure

enhancements to Malibu community education facilities.

The PAC, Campaign for Safety & Modernization at Santa Monica

College, headed by Shari Davis, supports the bond measure. Total

contributions to date are $520,447. Last year, in anticipation of a bond

measure, the PAC raised $111,947. An additional $408,500 has been

raised as of September 21, 2016. The largest donors are non-profits

related to the college; Santa Monica College Foundation ($200,000);

KCRW Foundation ($125,000); SMC Associated Students ($125,000);

the Madison Project DBA as the Broad Stage ($10,000); and, the

Committee for the Advancement of Public Education ($11,947).

Approximately $1835 has been spent to date on administrative

expenses including remit envelopes for contributions.

Opponents argue that the issue is not education, but fiscal

management; SMC bond debt funds, previously approved for similar

purposes in 1992, 2002,2004, and 2008 (totaling $613 million), either

already exist or were used for purposes unrelated to the bonds’

specified intent. There is no accounting of expenditures from the

previous bonds that will not be fully retired until 2038. Local property

owners bear exclusive responsibility for bond debt though only 4% of

the 30,000+ SMC students are graduates of Santa Monica or Malibu high

schools. Additionally, Prop 51 on the California state ballot, if passed,

will provide billions of dollars for state community colleges, including


To date, there is no committee formed or money raised opposing

Measure V.

To read the text of the ballot measures and the arguments for and

against, visit .

The next campaign disclosure statements are due September 29. Stay



Mary Marlow is a member of the Transparency Project. For more information, visit