Why I support H & HH.

Editor:

Unlike some of my NE neighbors I support H and HH. Why, when this will mean I, a 33 year resident in Santa Monica, will have to pay considerably more transfer tax when I sell my home?

Firstly, I believe that diversity is an important ingredient in any great City and that diversity includes people of many different socio/economic levels and it’s an important as part of the City’s overall sustainability policy. Having affordable housing means that a greater range of folks working in the City can actually live in the City reducing, or even better, eliminating drive time to work and thereby not contribute to the traffic that so many in the City complain of.

We should also understand that at some point all rent controlled apartments will, due to State mandated vacancy decontrol, return to market rate rents which will render these as unaffordable to many. We are losing more affordable and workforce housing than is being produced. Currently, affordable housing is created as part of new development projects either through construction of affordable units as part of the project or through fees paid to the City. This means that only new housing and commercial projects contribute to affordable housing production. This severely limits the amount of new affordable housing that can be produced. One solution to this limited production is to increase the percentage of affordable housing required in a new development. This will then require a developer to increase the rent levels of the market rate units (to offset the added cost of providing the increased number of affordable units) which will further increase the rent level difference between market rate and affordable units. So if our adult kids want to return to live in Santa Monica it will be that much more expensive to rent a place of their own.

I believe that all Santa Monicans benefit from having a diverse City. A look at how well real estate values did over the past decade indicates that the City remains and has become an even more attractive City in which to live. Therefore shouldn’t all Santa Monicans contribute to this diversity and the production of affordable housing? I believe so, but realities dictate that this would put significant financial burdens on many. H & HH solves this by only requiring a contribution at the time of selling your home. So a small portion of the windfall received from Santa Monica’s appeal will be paid towards affordable housing production. Folks who have lived here many years benefit most from rising real estate prices and have benefited most from Prop 13 property tax savings. That being the case paying the added transfer tax should not be a significant burden. The folks suffering the most from this are the speculative house flippers/mansion builders. The ones tearing down the smaller charming homes and building – most often ugly and nearly always huge – mansions. Yes it will mean they have to seek a higher sales price, but hey, the folks buying these homes can truly afford it. And the higher the price of these homes the higher the value of the existing housing stock offsetting the increased transfer tax.

So I say Vote H and HH.

Hank Koning

Santa Monica

No on H/HH

According to campaign finance statements on file with the City Clerk, the majority of the funding for the Development Tax, aka H+HH campaign, are developers, their lawyers and architects who will reap financial rewards from the building of new high density low income rental housing projects throughout Santa Monica, primarily North of Wilshire and in Sunset Park.

What is particularly disturbing is their misleading campaign literature. One mailer I received asserts H+HH will create affordable housing for teachers, police, and firefighters who currently cannot afford to live here. This is false. The City income guidelines provide the rental units are available to low and very low-income tenants. People in these professions earn far in excess of the maximum income limitations for low-income housing projects. I am not aware of any teacher, police officer or firefighter currently living in any of the over 2, 000 City developed low-income rental units.

In addition the most recent campaign flyer alleged without the development tax “many of our grandparents, parents, neighbors and friends will be forced out of their homes.” I have been renting in Santa Monica for over 25 years. Last years rent increase was $14.00 a month. It is absurd to claim all these people will be forced out of their homes because of a $14.00 a month rent increase. The City Housing Manager recently informed the City Council about 90% of the people on the waiting list for low-income housing live outside Santa Monica.

Your tax dollars will be used solely to fund City Hall’s favorite developers in producing large, high-density projects anywhere City Hall wants for people who do not currently live here.

The City has taken away your right to review or protest all development funded by this tax. It will be built in your immediate proximity – you cannot object. And, it will be current renters who are displaced as their buildings are torn down to make way for these new projects.

Say no to City Hall – no blank check to build large, high-density developments of any kind, wherever the bureaucrats want. Vote NO on H+HH

John Kelso

Santa Monica

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *