California has a long and glorious history of providing educational opportunities to all segments of its population. Lately, however, this commitment to life-long learning has faltered, and we should all be concerned.
If a measure, known as Senate Bill 173, already approved by the Senate and pending in the Assembly, is signed into law by Gov. Brown, classes for older adults and health and safety education would no longer be funded. By comparison, the governor’s revised budget calls for continuation of funding for older adult education for the next two years.
At a cost this year of about $750 million in an overall budget of nearly $91 billion, funding for these adult education programs is a small percentage for what we get. Medical professionals, including Dr. Gary Small of the UCLA Memory and Aging Research Center, have contacted me to re-enforce what his studies have shown: Keeping seniors physically and mentally active keeps them healthy.
By providing a community of peers, these programs also help ward off the isolation and loneliness that doctors say can lead to mental and physical deterioration.
Cutting adult education programming for seniors will ultimately increase costs to the state, especially in the area of mental health. Years of research studies in the American Journal of Epidemiology and the American Journal of Public Health demonstrate that attendance by seniors in the types of programs offered in noncredit education programs results in a significant reduction in the risk of contracting late-age dementia.
A well-known study, the Kungsholmen Project, followed 1,375 seniors over nine years and found that seniors who participated in physically, mentally, and socially stimulating activities contracted dementia at an 18-percent lower rate than seniors who did not participate in such activities. (American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 155, no. 12, June 15, 2002).
With California enjoying a structural surplus, it simply makes no sense to cut adult education programming. Even during the devastating budgetary years in the past, the Legislature decided these senior programs were important enough to not eliminate. It is incoherent policy to now end these programs when there’s a surplus.
Seniors account for 11.7 percent of the state’s current population of nearly 38 million. By 2030, one in every five Californians will be over age 65, says the Department of Aging.
About 3,200 of today’s seniors are served at the Emeritus College in my district, with great success. Operating for the past 37 years as part of Santa Monica College, Emeritus is a model for educating and improving the lives of seniors, surely a worthy governmental goal. We need to preserve these types of programs as more and more Baby Boomers retire and look to the state for educational opportunities — and ways to be productive and contribute to society.
Older citizens are a vital and contributing part of their communities. Charities, museums and other nonprofits depend on their senior volunteers to keep operating. They are taxpayers and reliable voters who consistently support educational propositions such as Prop. 30, which promised to continue funding programs such as older adult education.
Seniors have already taken deep cuts in services. From reductions to in-home support services to the elimination of adult day healthcare centers, seniors have borne much of the brunt of the state’s recession.
I urge everyone to sign my online petition at www.senate.ca.gov/lieu to urge Gov. Brown and the Legislature to continue stable funding of older adult education programs and to eliminate the threat of reduced state-supported offerings presented by SB 173.
While the ultimate goal is to provide stable funding for older adult education, as well as K-12 programs and community colleges, keep in mind that the day will come when all of us may need to use, and likely benefit from, having an effective program educating older adults.
Ted W. Lieu represents the more than 1 million residents of Senate District 28, which includes Santa Monica. For more, visit www.senate.ca.gov/lieu.
The choral groups I sing with through adult education provide the mental stimulation and social connection many older adults need. We also give back to the community through our wonderful free concerts. Please sign the petition!
Eliminating adult education would be short sighted, Some of the seniors who take advantage of such programs can ill afford to pay for education. How much more will it cost the state if the state have to pay increased health care costs for financially-disadvantaged seniors as a result of inactivity and earlier onset of dementia? The fitness classes are some of the most effective adult education classes. As a result of taking the fitness classes through the Saddleback emeritus program, I lost 22 lbs over a three year period and maintained it. My cholesterol levels are great with high HDL and a low total cholesterol to HDL ratio. My carotid arteries are the cleanest the testers said they have ever seen. I have reduced my waist circumference from 35 to 29 inches and lowered my body mass index from above 30 (which is considered obese though no on would dare say it to my face not even doctors) to between 22.6- to 23.6, which is considered normal. I went from a being at borderline risk for a fall to having minimal risk for a fall as a result of greater muscular strength in my lower extremities. Before I took the Saddleback fitness classes, I performed worse than a 91 year old in a balance test as a result of multiple car and other accidents. At the time, I was 59 years old, After 1.5 years of taking the Saddleback fitness classes, I performed in the 95th percentile of my age group.
Research shows that activities in aerobic classes, which incorporate many elements of dancing, are correlated with increased size of the hippocampus, the region of the brain responsible for memory. Non-obesity, healthy cholesterol numbers, low blood pressure, learning new dance steps are all associated with good cardiac and better mental health. SO why tamper with a good thing that is relatively more cost effective when compared to the costs of treating cardiac disease, type II diabetes, dementia, etc? Legislators, please think it through. Please do not be penny wise and pound foolish.
Yes, please sign this online petition for the continuation for the funding of the adult education programs. The benefits are so very clear as to why SB 173 should NOT pull through. Please vote to continue stable funding for the older adult education programs. Thank you all for taking this time.
Lesley Lowe, Chair of the Emeritus Institute at Saddleback College.
Please do not cancel Older Adult programs, eliminating them would be devastating to our Seniors. Please stop and think before you act. Excellent article
I think he says it all.
Ted Lieu is a thoughtful and intelligent person, and a good politician. A good representative of the Westside and South Bay. Older adults really are an important segment of the community!
This is an excellent article. We are lucky to have Ted Lieu as our Senate 28 Representative, which includes Santa Monica.
I am certainly interested in having additional funding from the State of California. I myself have benefitted from taking classes at Emeritus College (primarily exercise classes). I can attribute that to my longevity.