There were a number of community meetings last Monday night.

The “Chain Reaction” sculpture and the old Downtown post office building were on the Landmarks Commission’s agenda. The North of Montana Association (NOMA) neighborhood group hosted a presentation about development and traffic. City staff held an open house for residents to learn more about the repaving and other “enhancements” planned forLincoln Boulevardbetween the I-10 Freeway and the Veniceborder.

I was torn between attending the NOMA meeting or theLincoln Boulevardopen house.

According to City Hall’s website, “Lincoln Boulevard was recently relinquished toSanta Monicaby Caltrans and the city is undertaking a new project, funded by the Federal government, which will be implemented inlate 2012 …” Includedare rehabilitation of the roadway with new rubberized asphalt for a smoother and quieter street which I’m all for. Traffic light signal cameras will be installed to monitor both vehicles and bicycles. I’m all for this, too, as it should be a good tool to facilitate flow.

However, enhanced striping to include “better” crosswalk markings, left-turn lanes and/or pockets are another matter.Don’t kid yourself. Thisisn’t just about refreshing existing street markings.

You can bet your Prius this will result ina totally redesigned street layout and more vehicle impediments — ashas happenedeverywhere else in the city where markings have been repainted. Expect even more congestion and short-cutting through adjacent residential neighborhoods. Canplanted medians and curb bump-outs be far behind? Think Pico Boulevard streetscape on crack.

The big change will be rush hour, bicycle andbus-onlylanes “toprovide priority transitserviceduring peak commuting periods.” Curb parking will be prohibited during peak commutingperiods between Pico Boulevard and Ozone Avenue—between 7 a.m. and 10 a.m. north-bound andbetween 4 p.m.and 7 p.m. south-bound.

The City Council approved the lanes in September 2005 but they weren’t implemented pending installation of similar lanes inVeniceand Marina del Rey which haven’t happened, yet. Still, transportation managers are chomping at the bit to “calm” and “beautify”Lincoln.

This is traffic planningSanta Monicastyle. Where most cities would convertcurb parking lanes to traffic lanes during the rush to facilitate traffic movement, City Hall designates them for eightbuses and a few bicyclistsper hour while tens of thousands of cars jamremaining lanes.

Proponents say dedicated lanes will speed up busservice, making it more attractive to commuters. Unfortunately,a little more than a mile ofbus/bike lanes willsavea minute or two of travel time, at best. And,most buseswill have touse traffic lanes to turn left ontoPico Boulevard.

I wasn’t in the mood to hear traffic mismanagers spin how theirill-conceived proposals were going to turnLincolninto a more pleasant, traffic-efficient artery. I went to the NOMA meeting instead.

The highlight of NOMA’s get-together wasa presentation from Diana Gordon who heads the Santa Monica Coalition for aLivableCity. She talked about the massive amount of new development in Santa Monica’s future.

Gordon describedkey developmentsand their impacts —mega-developments such as the 760,000-square-footBergamotTransitVillageCenterat the site of the defunct Paper Mate plant at Olympic Boulevard and26th Street andthe Fairmont Miramar Hotel renovation and expansion. She mentioned the dozens ofnew smaller hotels and office/commercial/residential combo developments that will spread across town

Gordon mentioned that at least ahalf-dozen four- to eight-floor residential projects with 275 to 425 square foot, single and one bedroom apartments(with some retail space) are planned or under construction in the downtown area on and near Lincoln.

She disclosed that they’re all from just one major builder — NMS Properties. She wondered if thousands oftiny apartments with rents starting at $1,700 per month would be home tolong-term residents who would be involved in the community or short-term tenants on the move. “Is this good urban planning,” she queried?

Another $100 million worth of nonprofit affordable housing projects are proposed or under construction as part of City Hall’s affordable housing initiative weren’t included in herpresentation.

I think the packed house in the Main Library’s Martin Luther King Auditorium was stunned by the sheer volume of projects and their size. When she quoted City Hall’s favorite mantra, “They’ll generate no new netrush hour trips,” everyone had a big laugh.

She urged the public to get involved, early. She described the political process, in whichdevelopers and their cronies donateto campaigns of pro-development council incumbents and candidateswho, when elected, return the favor by supporting these projects — allwhileignoring their negative effects or lying about how there will be none or they’ll be fixed.

Council member and Metro transit board member Pam O’Connorwas in the house. She said the coming Expo Light Rail will alleviate traffic because it’ll provide an alternative to driving private vehicles.

The assertion was greeted with hisses and boos. This crowdknows thatExpo won’t negate the massive increase in trafficall these new developments will cause. O’Connor doesn’t get it. Lucky for her, she’s not up for re-election.

If this “slow development” movement gains community-wide traction (which it appears to be doing), how will it affectthe campaigns of incumbents Terry O’Day and Gleam Davis, who’ve been consistent development supportersand who have also opposed public disclosure of developer largess to political campaigns?

Inquiring minds want to know.





Bill can be reached at

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.